menu

Improving Network Performance II

进入实验练习

16 评论

3a08b4ef51f5f3b54278a48a98ba04a8

Pavel D. · 评论4 天之前

A4ade178d5f67f10638b5d0a4331ce22

Good stuff about Load Balancing on GCP. Great lab!

Harold Lawrence M. · 评论8 天之前

21427c74be9e56081d5ff8e8f6d46dab

Christopher C. · 评论10 天之前

45fb30df604662c3150e301650b66b0e

wowzer

seth t. · 评论13 天之前

Df99671eb5f70be28357a653250f232f

Julià P. · 评论14 天之前

C66a6271224502b1113f7dde1e319eae

Vegard H. · 评论16 天之前

B32786fd1d122c4e342f9e88fab46d11

Rich C. · 评论17 天之前

8fcd45cf09026120095e6affdbf25551

Rong F. · 评论17 天之前

B5a794a3a24d5931683a9ab16f939c52

Thomas J. · 评论21 天之前

Fca4e742caa8c5a1cb2abf5e3f56ccf2

The ack problem could be explained better.

Dirk H. · 评论24 天之前

44f378712e6d586d0d4d992e4937d6d2

Daniel S. · 评论29 天之前

88cbd9d72e4652d5d1b779480338db2b

Christopher A. · 评论大约 1 个月之前

Da5438f611b5d4ae56714f861135ed94

Great lab on CDN and load balancers

Douglas S. · 评论大约 2 个月之前

E24b66fa87ba78e244f470f90f9f77d9

In my tests, the TCP loadbalancer performance was really bad. The delay was about 2mn per request compared to 200ms for direct access. "After increasing the TCP window size, the new transfer rate and bandwidth are much faster." : this conclusion is not true when you compare the test results. For example, bandwidth was 202 Mbits/sec before adjusting the window, and it is 4.63 Mbits/sec after adjusting.

Ridha H. · 评论大约 2 个月之前

Dc476d2ac0281e6e13ac7695ce6cbfe7

Andras K. · 评论2 个月之前

19b5e626ebd1a9ddeb068fa7a7530fee

Ignas G. · 评论2 个月之前